Publications

A community-crowdsourced initiative to develop globally inclusive standards for Peer Review best practices

SDG indicator taxonomy for solution-oriented research output that allows for direct application to societal and environmental interventions.

Referring to the manuscript draft with the title: The cost of being a non-native English speaker in science (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184)

This collective preprint is an active document intended to encourage reflection on academic writing. It is meant to evolve as a result of continuous input from interested contributors. Everyone is welcome who wants to contribute.

Plan and monitor your PhD with a Gantt chart and include all of your activities in implementing Open Science practices to ensure efficiency and societal impact of your research work and efforts.

Enabling the adoption of Open Science practices for all researchers

Since research capacity varies drastically within and across world regions, local conditions such as available funding, research infrastructure, or internet connectivity should not interfere with the potential of academic success.

Be aware that each platform works with a specific search approach and algorithm

The Open Science Pie visualizes eight (8) important pieces of Open Science that can easily be implemented by any researcher to foster transparent, reproducible, and efficient research practices.

Cite as: Bezuidenhout, Louise, & Havemann, Johanna. (2020). The Varying Openness of Digital Open Science Tools. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4290795

Originally published on Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3732273

This article aims to provide a baseline evidence framework for ten of the most contested topics, in order to help frame and move forward discussions, practices, and policies.

[tl;dr: YES] Since Open Science has become a recurring buzzword for recent meta-scientific developments, this article summarizes what these developments entail.